Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mochizuki vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 1 - 0 Jubb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mochizuki has won 45.58% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 52.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mochizuki, in recent form, has won 50.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 54.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.27% and 36.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mochizuki has saved 52.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 63.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mochizuki has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with Jubb winning 69.33% (W/L 52/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mochizuki has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 59/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 13/ 16). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Mochizuki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 9/ 9), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mochizuki winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mochizuki winning 2 and Jubb winning 1. The last match between Mochizuki and Jubb was at the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger, 17-01-2023, First, Hard with Shintaro Mochizuki getting the victory 2-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mochizuki and Jubb have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mochizuki winning 1 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mochizuki winning 0, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mochizuki has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.87 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 291.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mochizuki has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mochizuki has converted 45.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 42.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
162
Rank
129
High
20
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
308
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
54% (158-132)
Career Total W/L
70% (199-86)
48% (12-13)
YTD W/L
69% (29-13)
$642,550
Career Prize Money
$54,540
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Shintaro Mochizuki | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:24 | 2:31:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (73/112) | 60% (55/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (52/73) | 73% (40/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (16/39) | 51% (19/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 23% (3/13) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (33/92) | 39% (44/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Paul Jubb
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shintaro Mochizuki | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (12/13) | 69% (29/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (30/33) | 65% (65/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (287/305) | 56% (543/435) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 74% (20/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 183 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 119 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:29 | 1:49:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 230.72 | 278.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (982/1954) | 63% (1938/3061) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (662/982) | 72% (1386/1938) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (443/972) | 53% (593/1123) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (92/204) | 41% (144/350) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (791/1911) | 42% (1355/3227) |
| Slam W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 67% (22/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 68% (28/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (8/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 53% (9/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 85% (27/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 15% (27/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 40% (15/6) |
Shintaro Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
67%
(
93 of
138)
1st Serve %
53%
(
78 of
148)
21
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
45 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
64 of
148)
157
Total Points Won
129
|
4-6 6-3 3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Stefano Napolitano
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Nick Hardt
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
47%
(
48 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
57%
(
59 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
90
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Daniel Altmaier
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Marco Cecchinato
50%
(
57 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
43%
(
24 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Francesco Ferrari
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniil Glinka
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Altug Celikbilek
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Orel Kimhi
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Paul Jubb
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Enzo Wallart
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Blake Mott
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
81%
(
78 of
96)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mochizuki Vs Jubb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
